MOST PROMISING ACADEMICIAN AWARD
ITEM |
DESCRIPTION |
BASIC CRITERIA FOR CANDIDATE : |
|
CANDIDATATURE PROCEDURES: |
The nomination of the academic member of staff by the faculty for this award is based on:
Each faculty/centre is required to nominate minimum 2 qualified academic members of staff for the Most Promising Academician Awards. The names of shortlisted candidates at faculty/ centre level will be forwarded by the University Academic Awards committee to CAIC |
DOCUMENTS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE CANDIDATE: |
Award Application Form
Important note: Candidate should be prepared to submit course file/ teaching file/ teaching folder and teaching portfolio if shortlisted. Confirmation of the candidature will be made by the organizing committee directly to the candidate. |
TEACHING PORTFOLIO FORMAT: |
Using 2D 50mm white folder with hard cover The contents should be arranged separately using file divider in the following order: Table of content Resume Teaching Philosophy Teaching Innovation & Approaches E-PAT results with students’ comments Recognitions/ Achievements/ Services provided Publications/ Conferences attended T&L Self development activities @ courses attended Other supporting documents Note: Other documents can be included to support the application |
COURSE FILE/TEACHING FILE/TEACHING FOLDER FORMAT: | According to each faculty’s respective course file format |
EVALUATION PROCESS |
First Stage Evaluation (40%) Practicum (30%)
Evaluation of portfolio (50%) is made based on exisiting T & L elements (preparation of instructional aids, lecture materials and references, assessment methods and learning outcomes) as well as the following additional elements:
Second/ Final Stage Evaluation (60%) Final Evaluation (for candidates who obtain 80% and above in the First Stage Evaluation)
|