MOST PROMISING ACADEMICIAN AWARD

ITEM 

• General requirements

  • Permanent/ contract academic member of staff
  • 1-5 years of teaching experience at tertiary level
  • Aged not more than 35 years on 1^st January of the year of the award.
  • Malaysian citizen only

  Has not been previous recipient of the University Academic Award in any category

The nomination of the academic member of staff by the faculty for this award is based on:

• Annual Work Target/ Annual Appraisal (minimum 80%)
• Has achieved ”Blended learning” status in KALAM
• E-PAT Marks (Minimum average marks of 85% for all courses taught in the year evaluated)

Each faculty/centre is required to nominate minimum 2 qualified academic members of staff for the Most Promising Academician Awards. The names of shortlisted candidates at faculty/ centre level will be forwarded by the University Academic Awards committee to CAIC

DOCUMENTS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE CANDIDATE:

Award Application Form

• Curriculum Vitae (CV) and the candidate’s achievements
• Brief statement of innovation in teaching & learning implemented. 

Important note: Candidate should be prepared to submit course file/ teaching file/ teaching folder and teaching portfolio if shortlisted. Confirmation of the candidature will be made by the organizing committee directly to the candidate.

Using 2D 50mm white folder with hard cover

The contents should be arranged separately using file divider in the following order:

Table of content

Resume

Teaching Philosophy

Teaching Innovation & Approaches

E-PAT results with students’ comments

Recognitions/ Achievements/ Services provided

Publications/ Conferences attended

T&L Self development activities @ courses attended

Other supporting documents

Note: Other documents can be included to support the application

EVALUATION PROCESS

First Stage Evaluation (40%)

Practicum (30%)

• Professional Peer Evaluation - dean, colleagues and students (20%)

 Evaluation of portfolio (50%)  is made based on exisiting T & L elements (preparation of instructional aids, lecture materials and references, assessment methods and learning outcomes) as well as the following additional elements:

• Teaching philosophy and innovation
• Research and publications
• Academic recognition
• Services to the university
• Supervision

Second/ Final Stage Evaluation (60%)

Final Evaluation (for candidates who obtain 80% and above in the First Stage Evaluation)

• Mock teaching
• Interview with the panel